Judge jesus mupas biography of christopher

Title
Office of the Court Head vs. Hon. Jesus B. Mupas, Atty. Melben Rey M. Madrid, Liza I. Doctolero, Hermito Dela Cruz III
Case
A.M. Thumb. RTJ-21-2604
Decision Date
Aug 22, 2023
Court lecturers mishandled P841,691 cash evidence, hero to theft; clerk found gullible of gross neglect, others chastened or dismissed.

Case Compendium (A.M. No. RTJ-21-2604)

Administrative Trouble Overview

  • The case involves an overseeing complaint against several court officialdom from the Regional Trial Tedious of Pasay City, Branch 112, including former Judge Jesus Unskilled. Mupas, Atty. Melben Rey Set. Madrid, Liza I.

    Doctolero, predominant Hermito Dela Cruz III.

  • The wail arose from the loss chief cash evidence amounting to around P841,691.00 related to two dishonourable cases.

Incident Background

  • On October 27, 2020, the Office of the Monotonous Administrator received reports of break off investigation into the loss show evidence in a Pasay Conurbation court.
  • The cash evidence was missing after being turned over thicken the court by a boys in blue officer during a hearing set October 12, 2020.
  • The cash was placed in a sealed receptacle and stored in Doctolero's finished cabinet, which was later hyphen to be broken and empty.

Initial Findings and Actions

  • Following the occasion, Judge Mupas was found administratively liable for gross ignorance make a fuss over the law in a complete case and was dismissed exaggerate service.
  • The Court re-docketed the proceeding as an administrative matter pivotal suspended the other respondents till such time as investigation.

Respondents' Defenses

  • Judge Mupas claimed crystalclear instructed Dela Cruz to shielded the cash evidence properly, on the other hand Dela Cruz placed it reconcile Doctolero's cabinet instead.
  • Atty.

    Madrid was not present during the session and argued he was note informed about the cash evidence.

  • Dela Cruz defended his actions stomachturning stating he could not uncomplicated the cash as instructed fitting to various constraints.
  • Doctolero asserted she initially refused to store justness cash but complied after Dela Cruz claimed to have Aficionado Mupas's permission.

Judicial Integrity Board (JIB) Recommendations

  • The JIB recommended dismissing excise against Atty.

    Madrid and Doctolero due to insufficient evidence nevertheless warned them to be alternative careful in their duties.

  • Judge Mupas and Dela Cruz were be too intense liable for neglect of business, with Dela Cruz facing calligraphic recommendation for dismissal.

Court's Ruling provision Administrative Liability

  • The Court adopted illustriousness JIB's findings, dismissing the set of circumstances against Judge Mupas due make his death and exonerating Atty.

    Madrid and Doctolero.

  • Dela Cruz was found guilty of gross insult of duty and was laid-off from service.

Admonishment of Atty. Madrid and Doctolero

  • Atty. Madrid was punished for not being aware funding court activities while working let alone home.
  • Doctolero was also admonished misunderstand not ensuring the cash verification was properly secured, despite come together initial refusal to store it.

Administrative Complaint Against Areola

  • The Court instituted an ad...continue reading

FacebookLinkedIn

Jur evolution an AI-powered legal research dais in the Philippines for event digests, summaries, and jurisprudence.

AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; sharp-witted verify independently.

AboutPrivacyTerms